Support community for TTG plugins and products.
NOTICE
The Turning Gate's Community has moved to a new home, at https://discourse.theturninggate.net.
This forum is now closed, and exists here as a read-only archive.
You are not logged in.
That one was easy! Thanks!
Take care,
Thanks, Rod. Actually, I have been using css for years. I've been looking for code to make the background tile in the Page Copy area and am not succeeding. I ahve also e-mailed you privately.
Take care,
I have both my menu and Social Media in the Top Palette and currently, the Social Media butts right up to the menu.
Is it possible to have the menu aligned left, and the Social Media aligned right? If so, how?
Thanks, I hope,
Thanks to both of you, Daniel and Rod...
Daniel, I changed the code for the background, but as Rod pointed out, the base image is quite small...
adding to what Daniel said, the image you're referencing is very small (62 x 57px)
Yes, but as with the regtular background, it is meant to be tiled.
Through some hit and miss, I did succeed with the font size -- challenging, since I am used to pt not rem. No matter, I won that round, albeit in a round-about way. I could not find exactly the css in exactly which that pesky (to me) code that you so nice noted resides:
html {
font-size: 16px;
text-rendering: optimizelegibility;
-ms-touch-action: manipulation;
touch-action: manipulation; /* remove 300ms delay in some browsers */
}
Sorry to be such a dunce. Having started out in straight HTML, graduating to php and Dreamweaver long before Adobe gobbled it up, this inspector stuff flummoxes me, although I taught myself html and web design through View Source.
Take care,
I know there is a global way to change the default size of the body font. I have my own css, and I tried changing the size in the Body portion of it with no success. Also, the site does not display the ghost background I would prefer:
Code in css:
body {
background-image: http://www.BCphotoadventures.com/Images … eghost.gif;
background-attachment: fixed;
font-family: Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif;
font-size: 10pt;
color: #002730;
}
Where have I once again gone astray?
Many thanks, as always,
More mark-up knowledge to add to my old html and php. This was easy and worked just as well.
Just in case I didn't make it clear, that was the issue.
BTW, did the indent with the old-fashioned !
Again, thanks
None, because I have not yet been able to figure out the phplugins for Backlight with our busy schedule! We are away far more than we are home! Unless... ... I added ttg's in error, not knowing what it would do ... Yup, I knew I had done something terribly wrong. After all, I give ttg credit in the footer along with a link.
You never cease to amaze me at how quickly you target the issue.
Now, to get my tag line to indent more.
Take care, and thanks!
As always, thank you, Rod. After some tweaking, I got the <figure> to behave as I wanted. I am still working on the line spacing, but that will come.
For those who want to place a single image inline with text AND a caption, as shown at http://www.bcphotoadventures.com/TESTSI … ographers/
This is the code I adapted from Rod's link. The class HTMLs come from my css style sheet that is linked to the template:
<figure class="alignright">
<img src="http://www.BCphotoadventures.com/BacklightSingles/HenriCartier-Bresson.jpg" class="alignright" alt="Magnum photographer Henri Cartier-Presson in Paris" width="374" height="244" /><br />
<figcaption align="center" class="CaptionItal">Henri Cartier-Bresson<br />
Used with permission of Magnum Photos</figcaption>
</figure>
There is one glitch, however, and I did something wrong, because now The Turning Gate has invaded the template
in three places:
The menu at the top (ignore those xx before many of the menu items that are just reminders for me to work on those pages);
The Social Media area; and
The masthead that used to show not only our logo (uploaded to Backlight) but our tag line!
HELP!
Meanwhile, thanks again, and
Take care,
I have searched, but cannot find something that I am sure is really easy. There are Backlight pages in which I want just a smaller image integrated into the text. I would like to add a caption underneath, but when I try to do it using the old Dreamweaver tactics (yeah, yeah, I know it doesn't work). I get a band across 100% of the Page Copy area with the image and the caption side by side, not what I had in mind.
I would like it to look like this with the caption under the image:
http://www.bcphotoadventures.com/TESTSI … ographers/
I know I am missing it, but where can I add a 1px line around the Page Copy area?
Thanks, as always to the great supporting team...
Take care,
All good information, Matthew. I'll try the free Pixsy and do a side-by-side comparison with Copytrack and report back for those who might be interested. I agree that the time and money involved in a suit is usually not worth it, but if the images are registered, the DMCA (Digital Millennium Copyright Act, for those who don't know) takedown notices work very well, and even then, we have been able to bill the infringers who prefer to pay rather than risk a suit that they know they will lose.
Take care,
Here's a recent article about recent changes to US copyright for images:
https://www.dpreview.com/news/437974539 … -of-photosSounds like an improvement.
And I can't vouch for this, haven't used it, have only just found it, but it sounds interesting.
https://www.pixsy.com/
It used to be that you could copyright a whole year (assuming you had not done so at least every 90 days) with one $55 fee. Now, there is a limit on the number of images you can copyright for that $55 fee.
As to Pixsy, I have heard about it. When I signed up for Copytrack, a similar service that goes after the infringers on your behalf, Pixsy wsn't around yet. For those who are following this thread, I would check out independent reviews and decide what is best for you.
Take care,
TBC
TBC wrote:I have created Actions in Photoshop for each copyright year, and all I have to do is click on the appropriate button. I don't find it a pain, as I only need it for exporting, and then I save it and send it along to the desired destination. For me, it is worth the extra 30 seconds or less to do it. And if I have a whole bunch of images to do, I do the same-year ones, batch process in PS, then go to the next year.
Take care,
So after the Ps action, you re-import the image in Lr so you can use Publisher? Do you do any image resizing when you export the image? Thanks!
Yes, I have a few folders for images destined for Backlight and Publisher use to accommodate different sizes/treatments I use (panos vs. 2:3 aspect ratio, for example, or 2:3 aspect ratio vs "framed prints").
I resize, then do final output sharpening before sending the image from LR to PS (with the destination folder of my choosing, of course). In PS, I add the Digimarc, usually in a batch process of a certain YYYY at a time. If I have images from another year, I do then in another batch. Then, I Add them back into LR all at once, and they obviously show up in the correct folder.
Just as output sharpening is not a one-size-fits-all process, the same holds true for Digimarc. Both are dependent on the final output size of the image.
Hope this helps. Frankly, it probably sounds more complicated than it actually is.
Take care,
Not for me! The Mail tool on my Mac preserves all metadata. This is with Sierra.
That is good to hear about Sierra. I'll look into it and pass along the information about Sierra to our alumni,
Thanks, and
Take care,
And I should add, and this drives me nuts, Mac computers strip file names and all metadata when you send an image out through their email program. Apple should know better, and it is irresponsible of them to not inform Mac users of this, so beware. If you are a Mac owner, be sure to send your images out through a regular e-mail program (gmail, etc.) that uses the paper-clip feature to attach an image to your message.
Take care,
I wrote a blog some years back that has been updated periodically called "© is for Copyright" at
http://www.BCphotoadventures.com/blog/2 … copyright/
There are also a number of other blogs on associated subjects such as how to create copyright preset in LR and PS.
Many of you here may find it interesting. Over the years, I have put a lot of time into helping strengthen the laws and educating photographers, art directors, designers, etc. about them, even as far away as Australia!
Arnie and I have used Digimarc for quite some years, since 1998. It is an individual, digitally-embedded watermark. That has helped us catch a number of infringements and resulted in some paid invoices! We have not had to go to court, since we do register our images through eCO, the electronic Copyright Office, and all we have to say to the infringer is that the image is registered with the US Copyright Office, and if they would like to go to court, there is no question that the image is ours, and they will have the priviledge of paying not only our fees, but damages, i.e. court costs. We have even succeeded with overseas infringements because of the Berne Convention. I don't want to get into a long discussion here, but we feel protecting your copyright is very important. Frankly, I am not enamored of people trying to make money off our images!
I have created Actions in Photoshop for each copyright year, and all I have to do is click on the appropriate button. I don't find it a pain, as I only need it for exporting, and then I save it and send it along to the desired destination. For me, it is worth the extra 30 seconds or less to do it. And if I have a whole bunch of images to do, I do the same-year ones, batch process in PS, then go to the next year.
Take care,
I would be interested in this, too, as we have had a number of cases of copyright infringement over the years, even to the point where the infringers were selling our work as their own. It is a pain to take the time to track down the thieves, do the DCMA take-down notices, etc. Alas, we live in an era of "What's mine is mine, and by the way, what's yours is mine, too!"
Take care,
Excellent, Rod. Ultimately, I settled on 16:7, and it works perfectly. Thank you ever so much.
For others who are interested in this topic, here is another pano gallery done with Galleria:
http://www.bc-fineartphotography.com/ga … panoramas/
Take care,
I found it, Rod. Thank you. My panos are different aspect ratios, as I create them according to the scene I am interpreting. Different aspect ratios do not seem to work in Galleria without adding a "cheat" background border, so I'll just compromise and for the purposes here, crop my panoramas to a 7:2 ratio, and the ones that don't like it, won't make the gallery cut! ![]()
So, I redid, and that gallery is now live. AND, I can demonstrate in our last session this morning what The Turning Gate can do as a plugin to Lightroom for those who have their own websites or who are contemplating ones in the future.
Again, thanks, and ...
Take care,
I think I missed the aspect ratio whose location I can never remember. I'll go on a hunt! We are in the middle of teaching a Lightroom workshop in Charleston, and I have mentioned The Turning Gate as a fabulous resource along with Jeffrey Friedl. I'll do so again tomorrow and show those who do their own websites what one can do. Hopefully, I can share the panos, too.
As alwaYS, THANKS,
http://www.bc-fineartphotography.com/ga … panoramas/
I have created an album of panoramas, loosely 1008x398. Galleria will not allow me to make the height less than 640. How can I get around this. I have hidden the gallery from view, so hopefully, the above link will work.
Thanks for any help that you can give on this.
I teach the techniques that go into panos, so this is frustrating for me.
Take care,
John,
It is actually Mogrify2. Between The Turning Gate and Jeffrey Friedl, I have almost all I need for Lightroom. I did create the watermark image in Photoshop, and as I said before, Digimarc. The latter I do with a batch process of actions I have created along the way, filtering for copyrights of YYYY year and processing them together, opening them up in PS CC when done.
All are HUGE time savers. With our workshops (that's the next site I have to attack), we are more than busy, and since my husband's talents do not go to the computer realm, the less I have to do "by hand" and the more time I can devote to other tasks and to actually get out and photograph! What a conce4pt!
Thank you so much for checking out the galleries and reporting back.
Take care,
John,
With Rod and Matthew's help, I think I have come up with what is, for me, a viable solution.
For the record, I prepare my images in LR using Jeffrey Friedl's Mogrify to add th double border and watermark. In PS, I just do my Digimarc.
Check out the galleries now, and thya re behaivng much better. I don't haVe to do anything any more in PS except for the Digimarcing.
Thanks for weighing in, and
Take care,
Rod, I'll check again tomorrow and let you know exacly where I previously found a challenge.
Thanks again,
I just edited my previous comment, so ignore it, and you answered my questions above, except for the panoramas, but I believe I also have th answer to that, unless you see another way to have a shallower aspect ratio.
Meanwhile, I'll experiment with the text below the galleries and perhaps a subheader (experimentation on the way here)...
Again, thanks,
Now, back to the salt mines... From my end, it all looks plausable, although I shall redo a few images to conform to my new specs. If you see otherwise, please let me know.